Goldin's art is not porn
Removing Nan Goldin's photograph from the Baltic gallery is an act of barbarity.
Removing Nan Goldin's photograph from the Baltic gallery is an act of barbarity.
Art in Gateshead together with the city's Baltic centre for contemporary art have been seen as a symbol of the popularisation of modern art in Britain. But now that "love affair" with is meaningless Gateshead after the police seized a picture by the photographer Nan Goldin from the Baltic.Goldin is an artist who shows a particular vision of the world in her work, the same world as Warhol and Lou Reed saw.
To take off a picture by Goldin and call it 'paedophile' you must be an idiot. Here are not subtleties: "Either you believe in the freedom of art galleries to exhibit modern art, which is provocative by nature, or you don't"
Art and artist from the first times have been criticized by hurt the "morality" and "decency" or been blamed as pornography.
We can see there are serious problems to understand the modern-art. Art should be seen as an educational instrument, everyone deserves to enjoy art and learn of it.http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2007/sep/27/goldinsartisnotporn
I'm so in love with his work, oh my dog, i want to only take pictures like him forever. Love u <3
ResponderEliminaroh this is so f*cking interestin!
ResponderEliminari love it!
i want take a pictures like this!
Take care!
As long as mankind tends to generate a second thought about a subject, there's no guarantee that art won't be criticized
ResponderEliminarEste comentario ha sido eliminado por el autor.
ResponderEliminarI loved the pictures, very interesting. So bad that people judge them wrongly.
ResponderEliminarit's a very interesting matter, those remember in Victorian time when they are more and more moralist but they have the masters of renascence, but paedophile? i don't understand of the edge of the censorship...
ResponderEliminarEDIT: words correction